Synopsis 2: Bits and Pieces
Larry Wall <larry@wall.org>
Maintainer: Larry Wall <larry@wall.org> Date: 10 Aug 2004 Last Modified: 7 Nov 2008 Number: 2 Version: 142
This document summarizes Apocalypse 2, which covers small-scale lexical items and typological issues. (These Synopses also contain updates to reflect the evolving design of Perl 6 over time, unlike the Apocalypses, which are frozen in time as "historical documents". These updates are not marked--if a Synopsis disagrees with its Apocalypse, assume the Synopsis is correct.)
To the extent allowed by sublanguages' parsers, Perl is parsed using a one-pass, predictive parser. That is, lookahead of more than one "longest token" is discouraged. The currently known exceptions to this are where the parser must:
[...] composer.
For some syntactic purposes, Perl distinguishes bracketing characters from non-bracketing. Bracketing characters are defined as any Unicode characters with either bidirectional mirrorings or Ps/Pe properties.
In practice, though, you're safest using matching characters with Ps/Pe properties, though ASCII angle brackets are a notable exception, since they're bidirectional but not in the Ps/Pe set.
Characters with no corresponding closing character do not qualify
as opening brackets. This includes the second section of the Unicode
BidiMirroring data table, as well as U+201A and U+201E.
If a character is already used in Ps/Pe mappings, then any entry
in BidiMirroring is ignored (both forward and backward mappings).
For any given Ps character, the next Pe codepoint (in numerical
order) is assumed to be its matching character even if that is not
what you might guess using left-right symmetry. Therefore U+298D
maps to U+298E, not U+2990, and U+298F maps to U+2990,
not U+298E. Neither U+298E nor U+2990 are valid bracket
openers, despite having reverse mappings in the BidiMirroring table.
The U+301D codepoint has two closing alternatives, U+301E and U+301F;
Perl 6 only recognizes the one with lower code point number, U+301E,
as the closing brace. This policy also applies to new one-to-many
mappings introduced in the future.
POD sections may be used reliably as multiline comments in Perl 6.
Unlike in Perl 5, POD syntax now requires that =begin comment
and =end comment delimit a POD block correctly without the need
for =cut. (In fact, =cut is now gone.) The format name does
not have to be comment -- any unrecognized format name will do
to make it a comment. (However, bare =begin and =end probably
aren't good enough, because all comments in them will show up in the
formatted output.)
We have single paragraph comments with =for comment as well.
That lets =for keep its meaning as the equivalent of a =begin
and =end combined. As with =begin and =end, a comment started
in code reverts to code afterwards.
Since there is a newline before the first =, the POD form of comment
counts as whitespace equivalent to a newline.
Except within a string literal, a # character always introduces a comment in
Perl 6. There are two forms of comment based on #. Embedded
comments require the # to be followed by one
or more opening bracketing characters.
All other uses of # are interpreted as single-line comments that
work just as in Perl 5, starting with a # character and
ending at the subsequent newline. They count as whitespace equivalent
to newline for purposes of separation. Unlike in Perl 5, #
may not be used as the delimiter in quoting constructs.
Embedded comments are supported as a variant on quoting syntax, introduced
by # plus any user-selected bracket characters (as defined in
/Lexical Conventions above):
say #( embedded comment ) "hello, world!";
$object\#{ embedded comments }.say;
$object\ #ã
embedded comments
ã.say;
Brackets may be nested, following the same policy as ordinary quote brackets.
There must be no space between the # and the opening bracket character.
(There may be the visual appearance of space for some double-wide
characters, however, such as the corner quotes above.)
An embedded comment is not allowed as the first thing on the line.
#sub foo # line-end comment
#{ # ILLEGAL, syntax error
# ...
#}
If you wish to have a comment there, you must disambiguate it to either an embedded comment or a line-end comment. You can put a space in front of it to make it an embedded comment:
#sub foo # line end comment
#{ # okay, comment
... # extends
} # to here
Or you can put something other than a single #
to make it a line-end comment. Therefore, if you are commenting out a
block of code using the line-comment form, we recommend that you use
##, or # followed by some whitespace, preferably a tab to keep
any tab formatting consistent:
##sub foo
##{ # okay
## ...
##}
# sub foo
# { # okay
# ...
# }
# sub foo
# { # okay
# ...
# }
However, it's often better to use pod comments because they are
implicitly line-oriented. And if you have an intelligent syntax
highlighter that will mark pod comments in a different color, there's
less visual need for a # on every line.
For all quoting constructs that use user-selected brackets, you can open with multiple identical bracket characters, which must be closed by the same number of closing brackets. Counting of nested brackets applies only to pairs of brackets of the same length as the opening brackets:
say #{{
This comment contains unmatched } and { { { { (ignored)
Plus a nested {{ ... }} pair (counted)
}} q<< <<woot>> >> # says " <<woot>> "
Note however that bare circumfix or postcircumfix <<...>> is
not a user-selected bracket, but the ASCII variant of the «...»
interpolating word list. Only # and the q-style quoters (including
m, s, tr, and rx) enable subsequent user-selected brackets.
Some languages such as C allow you to escape newline characters
to combine lines. Other languages (such as regexes) allow you to
backslash a space character for various reasons. Perl 6 generalizes
this notion to any kind of whitespace. Any contiguous whitespace
(including comments) may be hidden from the parser by prefixing it
with \. This is known as the "unspace". An unspace can suppress
any of several whitespace dependencies in Perl. For example, since
Perl requires an absence of whitespace between a noun and a postfix
operator, using unspace lets you line up postfix operators:
%hash\ {$key}
@array\ [$ix]
$subref\($arg)
As a special case to support the use above, a backslash where a postfix is expected is considered a degenerate form of unspace. Note that whitespace is not allowed before that, hence
$subref \($arg)
is a syntax error (two terms in a row). And
foo \($arg)
will be parsed as a list operator with a Capture argument:
foo(\($arg))
However, other forms of unspace may usefully be preceded by whitespace. (Unary uses of backslash may therefore never be followed by whitespace or they would be taken as an unspace.)
Other postfix operators may also make use of unspace:
$number\ ++;
$number\ --;
1+3\ i;
$object\ .say();
$object\#{ your ad here }.say
Another normal use of a you-don't-see-this-space is typically to put a dotted postfix on the next line:
$object\ # comment
.say
$object\#[ comment
].say
$object\
.say
But unspace is mainly about language extensibility: it lets you continue the line in any situation where a newline might confuse the parser, regardless of your currently installed parser. (Unless, of course, you override the unspace rule itself...)
Although we say that the unspace hides the whitespace from the parser,
it does not hide whitespace from the lexer. As a result, unspace is not
allowed within a token. Additionally, line numbers are still
counted if the unspace contains one or more newlines. A # following
such a newline is always an end-of-line comment, as described above.
Since Pod chunks count as whitespace to the language, they are also
swallowed up by unspace. Heredoc boundaries are suppressed, however,
so you can split excessively long heredoc intro lines like this:
ok(q:to'CODE', q:to'OUTPUT', \
"Here is a long description", \ # --more--
todo(:parrøt<0.42>, :dötnet<1.2>));
...
CODE
...
OUTPUT
To the heredoc parser that just looks like:
ok(q:to'CODE', q:to'OUTPUT', "Here is a long description", todo(:parrøt<0.42>, :dötnet<1.2>));
...
CODE
...
OUTPUT
Note that this is one of those cases in which it is fine to have whitespace before the unspace, since we're only trying to suppress the newline transition, not all whitespace as in the case of postfix parsing. (Note also that the example above is not meant to spec how the test suite works. :)
An unspace may contain a comment, but a comment may not contain an unspace. In particular, end-of-line comments do not treat backslash as significant. If you say:
#\ (...
it is an end-of-line comment, not an embedded comment. Write:
\ #(
...
)
to mean the other thing.
In general, whitespace is optional in Perl 6 except where it is needed to separate constructs that would be misconstrued as a single token or other syntactic unit. (In other words, Perl 6 follows the standard longest-token principle, or in the cases of large constructs, a prefer shifting to reducing principle. See /Grammatical Categories below for more on how a Perl program is analyzed into tokens.)
This is an unchanging deep rule, but the surface ramifications of it change as various operators and macros are added to or removed from the language, which we expect to happen because Perl 6 is designed to be a mutable language. In particular, there is a natural conflict between postfix operators and infix operators, either of which may occur after a term. If a given token may be interpreted as either a postfix operator or an infix operator, the infix operator requires space before it. Postfix operators may never have intervening space, though they may have an intervening dot. If further separation is desired, an embedded comment may be used as described above, as long as no whitespace occurs outside the embedded comment.
For instance, if you were to add your own infix:<++> operator,
then it must have space before it. The normal autoincrementing
postfix:<++> operator may never have space before it, but may
be written in any of these forms:
$x++
$x.++
$x\ ++
$x\ .++
$x\#( comment ).++
$x\#((( comment ))).++
$x\
.++
$x\ # comment
# inside unspace
.++
$x\ # comment
# inside unspace
++ # (but without the optional postfix dot)
$x\#ã comment
more comment
ã.++
$x\#[ comment 1
comment 2
=begin podstuff
whatever (pod comments ignore current parser state)
=end podstuff
comment 3
].++
A consequence of the postfix rule is that (except when delimiting a
quote or terminating an unspace) a dot with whitespace in front
of it is always considered a method call on $_ where a term is
expected. If a term is not expected at this point, it is a syntax
error. (Unless, of course, there is an infix operator of that name
beginning with dot. You could, for instance, define a Fortranly
infix:<.EQ.> if the fit took you. But you'll have to be sure to
always put whitespace in front of it, or it would be interpreted as
a postfix method call instead.)
For example,
foo .method
and
foo
.method
will always be interpreted as
foo $_.method
but never as
foo.method
Use some variant of
foo\
.method
if you mean the postfix method call.
One consequence of all this is that you may no longer write a Num as
42. with just a trailing dot. You must instead say either 42
or 42.0. In other words, a dot following a number can only be a
decimal point if the following character is a digit. Otherwise the
postfix dot will be taken to be the start of some kind of method call
syntax, whether long-dotty or not. (The .123 form with a leading
dot is still allowed however when a term is expected, and is equivalent
to 0.123 rather than $_.123.)
Types are officially compared using name equivalence rather than
structural equivalence. However, we're rather liberal in what we
consider a name. For example, the name includes the version and
authority associated with the module defining the type (even if
the type itself is "anonymous"). Beyond that, when you instantiate
a parametric type, the arguments are considered part of the "long
name" of the resulting type, so one Array of Int is equivalent to
another Array of Int. (Another way to look at it is that the type
instantiation "factory" is memoized.) Typename aliases are considered
equivalent to the original type.
This name equivalence of parametric types extends only to parameters that can be considered immutable (or that at least can have an immutable snapshot taken of them). Two distinct classes are never considered equivalent even if they have the same attributes because classes are not considered immutable.
Perl 6 supports the notion of properties on various kinds of objects. Properties are like object attributes, except that they're managed by the individual object rather than by the object's class.
According to S12, properties are actually implemented by a kind of mixin mechanism, and such mixins are accomplished by the generation of an individual anonymous class for the object (unless an identical anonymous class already exists and can safely be shared).
A variable's type is a constraint indicating what sorts of values the variable may contain. More precisely, it's a promise that the object or objects contained in the variable are capable of responding to the methods of the indicated "role". See S12 for more about roles.
# $x can contain only Int objects
my Int $x;
A variable may itself be bound to a container type that specifies how the container works, without specifying what kinds of things it contains.
# $x is implemented by the MyScalar class
my $x is MyScalar;
Constraints and container types can be used together:
# $x can contain only Int objects,
# and is implemented by the MyScalar class
my Int $x is MyScalar;
Note that $x is also initialized to ::Int. See below for more on this.
my Dog $spot by itself does not automatically call a Dog constructor.
It merely assigns an undefined Dog prototype object to $spot:
my Dog $spot; # $spot is initialized with ::Dog
my Dog $spot = Dog; # same thing
$spot.defined; # False
say $spot; # "Dog"
Any class name used as a value by itself is an undefined instance of that class's prototype, or protoobject. See S12 for more on that. (Any type name in rvalue context is parsed as a list operator indicating a typecast, but an argumentless one of these degenerates to a typecast of undef, producing the protoobject.)
To get a real Dog object, call a constructor method such as new:
my Dog $spot .= new;
my Dog $spot = $spot.new; # .= is rewritten into this
You can pass in arguments to the constructor as well:
my Dog $cerberus .= new(heads => 3);
my Dog $cerberus = $cerberus.new(heads => 3); # same thing
If you say
my int @array is MyArray;
you are declaring that the elements of @array are native integers,
but that the array itself is implemented by the MyArray class.
Untyped arrays and hashes are still perfectly acceptable, but have
the same performance issues they have in Perl 5.
To get the number of elements in an array, use the .elems method. You can
also ask for the total string length of an array's elements, in bytes,
codepoints or graphemes, using these methods .bytes, .codes or .graphs
respectively on the array. The same methods apply to strings as well.
(Note that .bytes is not guaranteed to be well-defined when the encoding
is unknown. Similarly, .codes is not well-defined unless you know which
canonicalization is in effect. Hence, both methods allow an optional argument
to specify the meaning exactly if it cannot be known from context.)
There is no .length method for either arrays or strings, because length
does not specify a unit.
Built-in object types start with an uppercase letter. This includes
immutable types (e.g. Int, Num, Complex, Rat, Str,
Bit, Regex, Set, Junction, Code, Block, List,
Seq), as well as mutable (container) types, such as Scalar,
Array, Hash, Buf, Routine, Module, etc.
Non-object (native) types are lowercase: int, num, complex,
rat, buf, bit. Native types are primarily intended for
declaring compact array storage. However, Perl will try to make those
look like their corresponding uppercase types if you treat them that way.
(In other words, it does autoboxing. Note, however, that sometimes
repeated autoboxing can slow your program more than the native type
can speed it up.)
Some object types can behave as value types. Every object can produce
a "WHICH" value that uniquely identifies the
object for hashing and other value-based comparisons. Normal objects
just use their address in memory, but if a class wishes to behave as a
value type, it can define a .WHICH method that makes different objects
look like the same object if they happen to have the same contents.
Variables with non-native types can always contain undefined values,
such as Object, Whatever and Failure objects. See S04 for more
about failures (i.e. unthrown exceptions):
my Int $x = undef; # works
Variables with native types do not support undefinedness: it is an error to assign an undefined value to them:
my int $y = undef; # dies
Conjecture: num might support the autoconversion of undef to NaN, since the floating-point form can represent this concept. Might be better to make that conversion optional though, so that the rocket designer can decide whether to self-destruct immediately or shortly thereafter.
Variables of non-native types start out containing an undefined value unless explicitly initialized to a defined value.
Every object supports a HOW function/method that returns the
metaclass instance managing it, regardless of whether the object
is defined:
'x'.HOW.methods; # get available methods for strings
Str.HOW.methods; # same thing with the prototype object Str
HOW(Str).methods; # same thing as function call
'x'.methods; # this is likely an error - not a meta object
Str.methods; # same thing
(For a prototype system (a non-class-based object system), all objects are merely managed by the same meta object.)
Perl 6 intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its
system of type declarations. Int automatically supports promotion
to arbitrary precision, as well as holding Inf and NaN values.
Note that Int assumes 2's complement arithmetic, so +^1 == -2
is guaranteed. (Native int operations need not support this on
machines that are not natively 2's complement. You must convert to
and from Int to do portable bitops on such ancient hardware.)
(Num may support arbitrary-precision floating-point arithmetic, but
is not required to unless we can do so portably and efficiently. Num
must support the largest native floating point format that runs at full speed.)
Rat supports arbitrary precision rational arithmetic. However,
dividing two Int objects using infix:</> produces a
fraction of Num type, not a ratio. You can produce a ratio by
using infix:<div> on two integers instead.
Lower-case types like int and num imply the native
machine representation for integers and floating-point numbers,
respectively, and do not promote to arbitrary precision, though
larger representations are always allowed for temporary values.
Unless qualified with a number of bits, int and num types represent
the largest native integer and floating-point types that run at full speed.
Numeric values in untyped variables use Int and Num semantics
rather than int and num.
Perl 6 should by default make standard IEEE floating point concepts
visible, such as Inf (infinity) and NaN (not a number). Within a
lexical scope, pragmas may specify the nature of temporary values,
and how floating point is to behave under various circumstances.
All IEEE modes must be lexically available via pragma except in cases
where that would entail heroic efforts to bypass a braindead platform.
The default floating-point modes do not throw exceptions but rather propagate Inf and NaN. The boxed object types may carry more detailed information on where overflow or underflow occurred. Numerics in Perl are not designed to give the identical answer everywhere. They are designed to give the typical programmer the tools to achieve a good enough answer most of the time. (Really good programmers may occasionally do even better.) Mostly this just involves using enough bits that the stupidities of the algorithm don't matter much.
A Str is a Unicode string object. There is no corresponding native
str type. However, since a Str object may fill multiple roles,
we say that a Str keeps track of its minimum and maximum Unicode
abstraction levels, and plays along nicely with the current lexical
scope's idea of the ideal character, whether that is bytes, codepoints,
graphemes, or characters in some language. For all builtin operations,
all Str positions are reported as position objects, not integers.
These StrPos objects point into a particular string at a particular
location independent of abstraction level, either by tracking the
string and position directly, or by generating an abstraction-level
independent representation of the offset from the beginning of the
string that will give the same results if applied to the same string
in any context. This is assuming the string isn't modified in the
meanwhile; a StrPos is not a "marker" and is not required to follow
changes to a mutable string. For instance, if you ask for the positions
of matches done by a substitution, the answers are reported in terms of the
original string (which may now be inaccessible!), not as positions within
the modified string. (However, if you use .pos on the modified string,
it will report the position of the end of the substitution in terms
of the new string.)
The subtraction of two StrPos objects gives a StrLen object,
which is also not an integer, because the string between two positions
also has multiple integer interpretations depending on the units.
A given StrLen may know that it represents 18 bytes, 7 codepoints,
3 graphemes, and 1 letter in Malayalam, but it might only know this
lazily because it actually just hangs onto the two StrPos endpoints
within the string that in turn may or may not just lazily point into
the string. (The lazy implementation of StrLen is much like a
Range object in that respect.)
If you use integers as arguments where position objects are expected, it will be assumed that you mean the units of the current lexically scoped Unicode abstraction level. (Which defaults to graphemes.) Otherwise you'll need to coerce to the proper units:
substr($string, 42.as(Bytes), 1.as(ArabicChars))
Of course, such a dimensional number will fail if used on a string that doesn't provide the appropriate abstraction level.
If a StrPos or StrLen is forced into a numeric context, it will
assume the units of the current Unicode abstraction level. It is
erroneous to pass such a non-dimensional number to a routine that
would interpret it with the wrong units.
Implementation note: since Perl 6 mandates that the default Unicode processing level must view graphemes as the fundamental unit rather than codepoints, this has some implications regarding efficient implementation. It is suggested that all graphemes be translated on input to a unique grapheme numbers and represented as integers within some kind of uniform array for fast substr access. For those graphemes that have a precomposed form, use of that codepoint is suggested. (Note that this means Latin-1 can still be represented internally with 8-bit integers.)
For graphemes that have no precomposed form, a temporary private id should be assigned that uniquely identifies the grapheme. If such ids are assigned consistently thoughout the process, comparison of two graphemes is no more difficult than the comparison of two integers, and comparison of base characters no more difficult than a direct lookup into the id-to-NFD table.
Obviously, any temporary grapheme ids must be translated back to some universal form (such as NFD) on output, and normal precomposed graphemes may turn into either NFC or NFD forms depending on the desired output. Maintaining a particular grapheme/id mapping over the life of the process may have some GC implications for long-running processes, but most processes will likely see a limited number of non-precomposed graphemes.
If the program has a scope that wants a codepoint view rather than a grapheme view, the string visible to that lexical scope must also be translated to universal form, just as with output translation. Alternately, the temporary grapheme ids may be hidden behind an abstraction layer. In any case, codepoint scope should never see any temporary grapheme ids. (The lexical codepoint declaration should probably specify which normalization form it prefers to view strings under. Such a declaration could be applied to input translation as well.)
A Buf is a stringish view of an array of
integers, and has no Unicode or character properties without explicit
conversion to some kind of Str. (A buf is the native counterpart.)
Typically it's an array of bytes serving as a buffer. Bitwise
operations on a Buf treat the entire buffer as a single large
integer. Bitwise operations on a Str generally fail unless the
Str in question can provide an abstract Buf interface somehow.
Coercion to Buf should generally invalidate the Str interface.
As a generic type Buf may be instantiated as (or bound to) any
of buf8, buf16, or buf32 (or to any type that provides the
appropriate Buf interface), but when used to create a buffer Buf
defaults to buf8.
Unlike Str types, Buf types prefer to deal with integer string
positions, and map these directly to the underlying compact array
as indices. That is, these are not necessarily byte positions--an
integer position just counts over the number of underlying positions,
where one position means one cell of the underlying integer type.
Builtin string operations on Buf types return integers and expect
integers when dealing with positions. As a limiting case, buf8 is
just an old-school byte string, and the positions are byte positions.
Note, though, that if you remap a section of buf32 memory to be
buf8, you'll have to multiply all your positions by 4.
Ordinarily a term beginning with * indicates a global function
or type name, but by itself, the * term captures the notion of
"Whatever", which is applied lazily by whatever operator it is an
argument to. Generally it can just be thought of as a "glob" that
gives you everything it can in that argument position. For instance:
if $x ~~ 1..* {...} # if 1 <= $x <= +Inf
my ($a,$b,$c) = "foo" xx *; # an arbitrary long list of "foo"
if /foo/ ff * {...} # a latching flipflop
@slice = @x[*;0;*]; # any Int
@slice = %x{*;'foo'}; # any keys in domain of 1st dimension
@array[*] # flattens, unlike @array[]
(*, *, $x) = (1, 2, 3); # skip first two elements
# (same as lvalue "undef" in Perl 5)
Whatever is an undefined prototype object derived from Any. As a
type it is abstract, and may not be instantiated as a defined object.
If for a particular MMD dispatch, nothing in the MMD system claims it,
it dispatches to as an Any with an undefined value, and usually
blows up constructively. If you say
say 1 + *;
you should probably not expect it to yield a reasonable answer, unless
you think an exception is reasonable. Since the Whatever object
is effectively immutable, the optimizer is free to recognize *
and optimize in the context of what operator it is being passed to.
A variant of * is the ** term. It is generally understood to
be a multidimension form of * when that makes sense.
Other uses for * will doubtless suggest themselves over time. These
can be given meaning via the MMD system, if not the compiler. In general
a Whatever should be interpreted as maximizing the degrees of freedom
in a dwimmey way, not as a nihilistic "don't care anymore--just shoot me".
Values with these types autobox to their uppercase counterparts when you treat them as objects:
bit single native bit
int native signed integer
uint native unsigned integer (autoboxes to Int)
buf native buffer (finite seq of native ints or uints, no Unicode)
num native floating point
complex native complex number
bool native boolean
Since native types cannot represent Perl's concept of undefined values,
in the absence of explicit initialization, native floating-point types
default to NaN, while integer types (including bit) default to 0.
The complex type defaults to NaN + NaN.i. A buf type of known size
defaults to a sequence of 0 values. If any native type is explicitly
initialized to * (the Whatever type), no initialization is attempted
and you'll get whatever was already there when the memory was allocated.
If a buf type is initialized with a Unicode string value, the string
is decomposed into Unicode codepoints, and each codepoint shoved into
an integer element. If the size of the buf type is not specified,
it takes its length from the initializing string. If the size
is specified, the initializing string is truncated or 0-padded as
necessary. If a codepoint doesn't fit into a buf's integer type,
a parse error is issued if this can be detected at compile time;
otherwise a warning is issued at run time and the overflowed buffer
element is filled with an appropriate replacement character, either
U+FFFD (REPLACEMENT CHARACTER) if the element's integer type is at
least 16 bits, or U+007f (DELETE) if the larger value would not fit.
If any other conversion is desired, it must be specified explicitly.
In particular, no conversion to UTF-8 or UTF-16 is attempted; that
must be specified explicitly. (As it happens, conversion to a buf
type based on 32-bit integers produces valid UTF-32 in the native
endianness.)
These can behave as values or objects of any class, except that
defined always returns false. One can create them with the
built-in undef and fail functions. (See S04 for how failures
are handled.)
Nil Empty list viewed as an item
Object Uninitialized (derivatives serve as protoobjects of classes)
Whatever Wildcard (like undef, but subject to do-what-I-mean via MMD)
Failure Failure (lazy exceptions, thrown if not handled properly)
Whenever you declare any kind of type, class, module, or package, you're automatically declaring a undefined prototype value with the same name.
Whenever a Failure value is put into a typed container, it takes
on the type specified by the container but continues to carry the
Failure role. (The undef function merely returns the most
generic Failure object. Use fail to return more specific failures. Use
Object for the most generic non-failure undefined value. The Any
type is also undefined, but excludes Junctions so that autothreading
may be dispatched using normal multiple dispatch rules.)
The Nil type is officially undefined as an item but interpolates
as a null list into list context, and an empty capture into slice
context. A Nil object may also carry failure information,
but if so, the object behaves as a failure only in item context.
Use Failure/undef when you want to return a hard failure that
will not evaporate in list context.
Objects with these types behave like values, i.e. $x === $y is true
if and only if their types and contents are identical (that is, if
$x.WHICH eqv $y.WHICH).
Bit Perl single bit (allows traits, aliasing, undef, etc.)
Int Perl integer (allows Inf/NaN, arbitrary precision, etc.)
Str Perl string (finite sequence of Unicode characters)
Num Perl number
Rat Perl rational
Complex Perl complex number
Bool Perl boolean
Exception Perl exception
Code Base class for all executable objects
Block Executable objects that have lexical scopes
List Lazy Perl list (composed of immutables and iterators)
Seq Completely evaluated (hence immutable) sequence
Range A pair of Ordered endpoints; gens immutables when iterated
Set Unordered collection of values that allows no duplicates
Bag Unordered collection of values that allows duplicates
Junction Set with additional behaviors
Pair A single key-to-value association
Mapping Set of Pairs with no duplicate keys
Signature Function parameters (left-hand side of a binding)
Capture Function call arguments (right-hand side of a binding)
Blob An undifferentiated mass of bits
Objects with these types have distinct .WHICH values that do not change
even if the object's contents change. (Routines are considered mutable
because they can be wrapped in place.)
Scalar Perl scalar
Array Perl array
Hash Perl hash
KeyHash Perl hash that autodeletes values matching default
KeySet KeyHash of Bool (does Set in list/array context)
KeyBag KeyHash of UInt (does Bag in list/array context)
Buf Perl buffer (a stringish array of memory locations)
IO Perl filehandle
Routine Base class for all wrappable executable objects
Sub Perl subroutine
Method Perl method
Submethod Perl subroutine acting like a method
Macro Perl compile-time subroutine
Regex Perl pattern
Match Perl match, usually produced by applying a pattern
Package Perl 5 compatible namespace
Module Perl 6 standard namespace
Class Perl 6 standard class namespace
Role Perl 6 standard generic interface/implementation
Grammar Perl 6 pattern matching namespace
Any Perl 6 object (default parameter type, excludes Junction)
Object Perl 6 object (either Any or Junction)
A KeyHash differs from a normal Hash in how it handles default
values. If the value of a KeyHash element is set to the default
value for the KeyHash, the element is deleted. If undeclared,
the default default for a KeyHash is 0 for numeric types, False
for boolean types, and the null string for string and buffer types.
A KeyHash of a Object type defaults to the undefined prototype
for that type. More generally, the default default is whatever defined
value an undef would convert to for that value type. A KeyHash
of Scalar deletes elements that go to either 0 or the null string.
A KeyHash also autodeletes keys for normal undef values (that is,
those undefined values that do not contain an unthrown exception).
A KeySet is a KeyHash of booleans with a default of False.
If you use the Hash interface and increment an element of a
KeySet its value becomes true (creating the element if it doesn't
exist already). If you decrement the element it becomes false and
is automatically deleted. Decrementing a non-existing value results
in a False value. Incrementing an existing value results in True.
When not used as a Hash (that is,
when used as an Array or list or Set object) a KeySet
behaves as a Set of its keys. (Since the only possible value of
a KeySet is the True value, it need not be represented in
the actual implementation with any bits at all.)
A KeyBag is a KeyHash of UInt with default of 0. If you
use the Hash interface and increment an element of a KeyBag
its value is increased by one (creating the element if it doesn't exist
already). If you decrement the element the value is decreased by one;
if the value goes to 0 the element is automatically deleted. An attempt
to decrement a non-existing value results in a Failure value. When not
used as a Hash (that is, when used as an Array or list or Bag
object) a KeyBag behaves as a Bag of its keys, with each key
replicated the number of times specified by its corresponding value.
(Use .kv or .pairs to suppress this behavior in list context.)
Explicit types are optional. Perl variables have two associated types:
their "value type" and their "implementation type". (More generally, any
container has an implementation type, including subroutines and modules.)
The value type is stored as its of property, while the implementation
type of the container is just the object type of the container itself.
The word returns is allowed as an alias for of.
The value type specifies what kinds of values may be stored in the
variable. A value type is given as a prefix or with the of keyword:
my Dog $spot;
my $spot of Dog;
In either case this sets the of property of the container to Dog.
Subroutines have a variant of the of property, as, that sets
the as property instead. The as property specifies a
constraint (or perhaps coercion) to be enforced on the return value (either
by explicit call to return or by implicit fall-off-the-end return).
This constraint, unlike the of property, is not advertised as the
type of the routine. You can think of it as the implicit type signature of
the (possibly implicit) return statement. It's therefore available for
type inferencing within the routine but not outside it. If no as type
is declared, it is assumed to be the same as the of type, if declared.
sub get_pet() of Animal {...} # of type, obviously
sub get_pet() returns Animal {...} # of type
our Animal sub get_pet() {...} # of type
sub get_pet() as Animal {...} # as type
A value type on an array or hash specifies the type stored by each element:
my Dog @pound; # each element of the array stores a Dog
my Rat %ship; # the value of each entry stores a Rat
The key type of a hash may be specified as a shape trait--see S09.
The implementation type specifies how the variable itself is implemented. It is given as a trait of the variable:
my $spot is Scalar; # this is the default
my $spot is PersistentScalar;
my $spot is DataBase;
Defining an implementation type is the Perl 6 equivalent to tying
a variable in Perl 5. But Perl 6 variables are tied directly at
declaration time, and for performance reasons may not be tied with a
run-time tie statement unless the variable is explicitly declared
with an implementation type that does the Tieable role.
However, package variables are always considered Tieable by default.
As a consequence, all named packages are also Tieable by default.
Classes and modules may be viewed as differently tied packages.
Looking at it from the other direction, classes and modules that
wish to be bound to a global package name must be able to do the
Package role.
A non-scalar type may be qualified, in order to specify what type of value each of its elements stores:
my Egg $cup; # the value is an Egg
my Egg @carton; # each elem is an Egg
my Array of Egg @box; # each elem is an array of Eggs
my Array of Array of Egg @crate; # each elem is an array of arrays of Eggs
my Hash of Array of Recipe %book; # each value is a hash of arrays of Recipes
Each successive of makes the type on its right a parameter of the
type on its left. Parametric types are named using square brackets, so:
my Hash of Array of Recipe %book;
actually means:
my Hash[of => Array[of => Recipe]] %book;
Because the actual variable can be hard to find when complex types are specified, there is a postfix form as well:
my Hash of Array of Recipe %book; # HoHoAoRecipe
my %book of Hash of Array of Recipe; # same thing
The as form may be used in subroutines:
my sub get_book ($key) as Hash of Array of Recipe {...}
Alternately, the return type may be specified within the signature:
my sub get_book ($key --> Hash of Array of Recipe) {...}
There is a slight difference, insofar as the type inferencer will
ignore a as but pay attention to --> or prefix type
declarations, also known as the of type. Only the inside of the
subroutine pays attention to as, and essentially coerces the return
value to the indicated type, just as if you'd coerced each return expression.
You may also specify the of type as the of trait (with returns
allowed as a synonym):
my Hash of Array of Recipe sub get_book ($key) {...}
my sub get_book ($key) of Hash of Array of Recipe {...}
my sub get_book ($key) returns Hash of Array of Recipe {...}
Anywhere you can use a single type you can use a set of types, for convenience specifiable as if it were an "or" junction:
my Int|Str $error = $val; # can assign if $val~~Int or $val~~Str
Fancier type constraints may be expressed through a subtype:
subset Shinola of Any where {.does(DessertWax) and .does(FloorTopping)};
if $shimmer ~~ Shinola {...} # $shimmer must do both interfaces
Since the terms in a parameter could be viewed as a set of
constraints that are implicitly "anded" together (the variable itself
supplies type constraints, and where clauses or tree matching just
add more constraints), we relax this to allow juxtaposition of
types to act like an "and" junction:
# Anything assigned to the variable $mitsy must conform
# to the type Fish and either the Cat or Dog type...
my Cat|Dog Fish $mitsy = new Fish but { Bool.pick ?? .does Cat
!! .does Dog };
Parameters may be given types, just like any other variable:
sub max (int @array is rw) {...}
sub max (@array of int is rw) {...}
Within a declaration, a class variable (either by itself or following an existing type name) declares a new type name and takes its parametric value from the actual type of the parameter it is associated with. It declares the new type name in the same scope as the associated declaration.
sub max (Num ::X @array) {
push @array, X.new();
}
The new type name is introduced immediately, so two such types in the same signature must unify compatibly if they have the same name:
sub compare (Any ::T $x, T $y) {
return $x eqv $y;
}
On a scoped subroutine, a return type can be specified before or after
the name. We call all return types "return types", but distinguish
two kinds of return types, the as type and the of type,
because the of type is normally an "official" named type and
declares the official interface to the routine, while the as
type is merely a constraint on what may be returned by the routine
from the routine's point of view.
our sub lay as Egg {...} # as type
our Egg sub lay {...} # of type
our sub lay of Egg {...} # of type
our sub lay (--> Egg) {...} # of type
my sub hat as Rabbit {...} # as type
my Rabbit sub hat {...} # of type
my sub hat of Rabbit {...} # of type
my sub hat (--> Rabbit) {...} # of type
If a subroutine is not explicitly scoped, it belongs to the current
namespace (module, class, grammar, or package), as if it's scoped with
the our scope modifier. Any return type must go after the name:
sub lay as Egg {...} # as type
sub lay of Egg {...} # of type
sub lay (--> Egg) {...} # of type
On an anonymous subroutine, any return type can only go after the sub
keyword:
$lay = sub as Egg {...}; # as type
$lay = sub of Egg {...}; # of type
$lay = sub (--> Egg) {...}; # of type
but you can use a scope modifier to introduce an of prefix type:
$lay = my Egg sub {...}; # of type
$hat = my Rabbit sub {...}; # of type
Because they are anonymous, you can change the my modifier to our
without affecting the meaning.
The return type may also be specified after a --> token within
the signature. This doesn't mean exactly the same thing as as.
The of type is the "official" return type, and may therefore be
used to do type inferencing outside the sub. The as type only
makes the return type available to the internals of the sub so that
the return statement can know its context, but outside the sub we
don't know anything about the return value, as if no return type had
been declared. The prefix form specifies the of type rather than
the as type, so the return type of
my Fish sub wanda ($x) { ... }
is known to return an object of type Fish, as if you'd said:
my sub wanda ($x --> Fish) { ... }
not as if you'd said
my sub wanda ($x) as Fish { ... }
It is possible for the of type to disagree with the as type:
my Squid sub wanda ($x) as Fish { ... }
or equivalently,
my sub wanda ($x --> Squid) as Fish { ... }
This is not lying to yourself--it's lying to the world. Having a different inner type is useful if you wish to hold your routine to a stricter standard than you let on to the outside world, for instance.
$Package'var syntax is gone. Use $Package::var instead.
Perl 6 includes a system of sigils to mark the fundamental structural type of a variable:
$ scalar (object)
@ ordered array
% unordered hash (associative array)
& code/rule/token/regex
:: package/module/class/role/subset/enum/type/grammar
@@ slice view of @
Within a declaration, the & sigil also declares the visibility of the
subroutine name without the sigil within the scope of the declaration:
my &func := sub { say "Hi" };
func; # calls &func
Within a signature or other declaration, the :: sigil followed by an
identifier marks a type variable that also declares the visibility
of a package/type name without the sigil within the scope of the
declaration. The first such declaration within a scope is assumed
to be an unbound type, and takes the actual type of its associated
argument. With subsequent declarations in the same scope the use of
the sigil is optional, since the bare type name is also declared.
A declaration nested within must not use the sigil if it wishes to refer to the same type, since the inner declaration would rebind the type. (Note that the signature of a pointy block counts as part of the inner block, not the outer block.)
Sigils indicate overall interface, not the exact type of the bound object. Different sigils imply different minimal abilities.
$x may be bound to any object, including any object that can be
bound to any other sigil. Such a scalar variable is always treated as
a singular item in any kind of list context, regardless of whether the
object is essentially composite or unitary. It will not automatically
dereference to its contents unless placed explicitly in some kind of
dereferencing context. In particular, when interpolating into list
context, $x never expands its object to anything other than the
object itself as a single item, even if the object is a container
object containing multiple items.
@x may be bound to an object of the Array class, but it may also
be bound to any object that does the Positional role, such as a
List, Seq, Range, Buf, or Capture. The Positional
role implies the ability to support postcircumfix:<[ ]>.
Likewise, %x may be bound to any object that does the Associative
role, such as Pair, Mapping, Set, Bag, KeyHash, or
Capture. The Associative role implies the ability to support
postcircumfix:<{ }>.
&x may be bound to any object that does the Callable role, such
as any Block or Routine. The Callable role implies the ability
to support postcircumfix:<( )>.
::x may be bound to any object that does the Abstraction role,
such as a typename, package, module, class, role, grammar, or any other
protoobject with .HOW hooks. This Abstraction role implies the
ability to do various symbol table and/or typological manipulations which
may or may not be supported by any given abstraction. Mostly though it
just means that you want to give some abstraction an official name that
you can then use later in the compilation without any sigil.
In any case, the minimal container role implied by the sigil is
checked at binding time at the latest, and may fail earlier (such
as at compile time) if a semantic error can be detected sooner.
If you wish to bind an object that doesn't yet do the appropriate
role, you must either stick with the generic $ sigil, or mix in
the appropriate role before binding to a more specific sigil.
An object is allowed to support both Positional and Associative.
An object that does not support Positional may not be bound directly
to @x. However, any construct such as %x that can interpolate
the contents of such an object into list context can automatically
construct a list value that may then be bound to an array variable.
Subscripting such a list does not imply subscripting back into the
original object.
Ordinary sigils indicate normally scoped variables, either lexical or package scoped. Oddly scoped variables include a secondary sigil (a twigil) that indicates what kind of strange scoping the variable is subject to:
$foo ordinary scoping
$.foo object attribute accessor
$^foo self-declared formal positional parameter
$:foo self-declared formal named parameter
$*foo global variable
$+foo contextual variable
$?foo compiler hint variable
$=foo pod variable
$<foo> match variable, short for $/{'foo'}
$!foo explicitly private attribute (mapped to $foo though)
Most variables with twigils are implicitly declared or assumed to
be declared in some other scope, and don't need a "my" or "our".
Attribute variables are declared with has, though.
$ always means a scalar variable, @
an array variable, and % a hash variable, even when subscripting.
In item context, variables such as @array and %hash simply
return themselves as Array and Hash objects. (Item context was
formerly known as scalar context, but we now reserve the "scalar"
notion for talking about variables rather than contexts, much as
arrays are disassociated from list context.)
.perl method.
Like the Data::Dumper module in Perl 5, the .perl method will put
quotes around strings, square brackets around list values, curlies around
hash values, constructors around objects, etc., so that Perl can evaluate
the result back to the same object.
To get a formatted representation of any scalar value, use the
.fmt('%03d') method to do an implicit sprintf on the value.
To format an array value separated by commas, supply a second argument:
.fmt('%03d', ', '). To format a hash value or list of pairs, include
formats for both key and value in the first string: .fmt('%s: %s', "\n").
@foo.[1] and %bar.{'a'}) that makes the dereference
a little more explicit. Constant string subscripts may be placed
in angles, so %bar.{'a'} may also be written as %bar<a>
or %bar.<a>. Additionally, you may insert extra whitespace
using the unspace.
The context in which a subscript is evaluated is no longer controlled by the sigil either. Subscripts are always evaluated in list context. (More specifically, they are evaluated in a variant of list context known as slice context, which preserves dimensional information so that you can do multi-dimensional slices using semicolons. However, each slice dimension evaluates its sublist in normal list context, so functions called as part of a subscript don't see a slice context. See S09 for more on slice context.)
If you need to force inner context to item (scalar), we now have convenient single-character context specifiers such as + for numbers and ~ for strings:
$x = g(); # item context for g()
@x[f()] = g(); # list context for f() and g()
@x[f()] = +g(); # list context for f(), numeric item context for g()
@x[+f()] = g(); # numeric item context for f(), list context for g()
@x[f()] = @y[g()]; # list context for f() and g()
@x[f()] = +@y[g()]; # list context for f() and g()
@x[+f()] = @y[g()]; # numeric item context for f(), list context for g()
@x[f()] = @y[+g()]; # list context for f(), numeric item context for g()
%x{~f()} = %y{g()}; # string item context for f(), list context for g()
%x{f()} = %y{~g()}; # list context for f(), string item context for g()
Sigils used either as functions or as list prefix operators also force context, so these also work:
@x[$(g())] # item context for g()
@x[$ g()] # item context for g()
%x{$(g())} # item context for g()
%x{$ g()} # item context for g()
But note that these don't do the same thing:
@x[$g()] # call function in $g
%x{$g()} # call function in $g
:= binding operator that lets you bind
names to Array and Hash objects without copying, in the same way
as subroutine arguments are bound to formal parameters. See S06
for more about binding.
An argument list may be captured into an object with backslashed parens:
$args = \(1,2,3,:mice<blind>)
Values in a Capture object are parsed as ordinary expressions, marked as
invocant, positional, named, and so on.
Like List objects, Capture objects are immutable in the abstract, but
evaluate their arguments lazily. Before everything inside a Capture is
fully evaluated (which happens at compile time when all the arguments are
constants), the eventual value may well be unknown. All we know is
that we have the promise to make the bits of it immutable as they become known.
Capture objects may contain multiple unresolved iterators such as feeds
or slices. How these are resolved depends on what they are eventually
bound to. Some bindings are sensitive to multiple dimensions while
others are not.
You may retrieve parts from a Capture object with a prefix sigil operator:
$args = \3; # same as "$args = \(3)"
$$args; # same as "$args as Scalar" or "Scalar($args)"
@$args; # same as "$args as Array" or "Array($args)"
%$args; # same as "$args as Hash" or "Hash($args)"
When cast into an array, you can access all the positional arguments; into a hash, all named arguments; into a scalar, its invocant.
All prefix sigil operators accept one positional argument, evaluated in
item context as a rvalue. They can interpolate in strings if called with
parentheses. The special syntax form $() translates into $( $/ )
to operate on the current match object; the same applies to @() and %().
Capture objects fill the ecological niche of references in Perl 6.
You can think of them as "fat" references, that is, references that
can capture not only the current identity of a single object, but
also the relative identities of several related objects. Conversely,
you can think of Perl 5 references as a degenerate form of Capture
when you want to refer only to a single item.
A signature object (Signature) may be created with colon-prefixed parens:
my ::MySig ::= :(Int, Num, Complex, Status)
Expressions inside the signature are parsed as parameter declarations rather than ordinary expressions. See S06 for more details on the syntax for parameters.
Signature objects bound to type variables (as in the example above) may
be used within other signatures to apply additional type constraints.
When applied to a Capture argument, the signature allows you to
take the types of the capture's arguments from MySig, but declare
the (untyped) variable names yourself via an additional signature
in parentheses:
sub foo (Num Dog|Cat $numdog, MySig $a ($i,$j,$k,$mousestatus)) {...}
foo($mynumdog, \(1, 2.7182818, 1.0i, statmouse());
Unlike in Perl 5, the notation &foo merely stands for the foo
function as a Code object without calling it. You may call any Code
object with parens after it (which may, of course, contain arguments):
&foo($arg1, $arg2);
Whitespace is not allowed before the parens because it is parsed as
a postfix. As with any postfix, there is also a corresponding .()
operator, and you may use the "unspace" form to insert optional
whitespace and comments between the backslash and either of the
postfix forms:
&foo\ ($arg1, $arg2);
&foo\ .($arg1, $arg2);
&foo\#[
embedded comment
].($arg1, $arg2);
With multiple dispatch, &foo may actually be the name of a set
of candidate functions (which you can use as if it were an ordinary function).
However, in that case &foo by itself is not be sufficient to uniquely
name a specific function. To do that, the type may be refined by
using a signature literal as a postfix operator:
&foo:(Int,Num)
It still just returns a Code object. A call may also be partially
applied by using the .assuming method:
&foo.assuming(1,2,3,:mice<blind>)
To make a slice subscript return something other than values, append an appropriate adverb to the subscript.
@array = <A B>;
@array[0,1,2]; # returns 'A', 'B', undef
@array[0,1,2] :p; # returns 0 => 'A', 1 => 'B'
@array[0,1,2] :kv; # returns 0, 'A', 1, 'B'
@array[0,1,2] :k; # returns 0, 1
@array[0,1,2] :v; # returns 'A', 'B'
%hash = (:a<A>, :b<B>);
%hash<a b c>; # returns 'A', 'B', undef
%hash<a b c> :p; # returns a => 'A', b => 'B'
%hash<a b c> :kv; # returns 'a', 'A', 'b', 'B'
%hash<a b c> :k; # returns 'a', 'b'
%hash<a b c> :v; # returns 'A', 'B'
These adverbial forms all weed out non-existing entries. You may also perform an existence test, which will return true if all the elements of the slice exist:
if %hash<a b c> :exists {...}
likewise,
my ($a,$b,$c) = %hash<a b c> :delete;
deletes the entries "en passant" while returning them. (Of course, any of these forms also work in the degenerate case of a slice containing a single index.) Note that these forms work by virtue of the fact that the subscript is the topmost previous operator. You may have to parenthesize or force list context if some other operator that is tighter than comma would appear to be topmost:
1 + (%hash{$x} :delete);
$x = (%hash{$x} :delete);
($x) = %hash{$x} :delete;
(The situation does not often arise for the slice modifiers above because they are usually used in list context, which operates at comma precedence.)
Int or Num), a Hash object
becomes the number of pairs contained in the hash. In a boolean context, a
Hash object is true if there are any pairs in the hash. In either case,
any intrinsic iterator would be reset. (If hashes do carry an intrinsic
iterator (as they do in Perl 5), there will be a .reset method on the
hash object to reset the iterator explicitly.)
sort see S29.
$*PID or @*ARGS.
$_ and @_, as well as the new $/, which
is the return value of the last regex match. $0, $1, $2, etc.,
are aliases into the $/ object.
$#foo notation is dead. Use @foo.end or @foo[*-1] instead.
(Or @foo.shape[$dimension] for multidimensional arrays.)
An identifier is composed of an alphabetic character followed by any sequence of alphanumeric characters. The definitions of alphabetic and numeric include appropriate Unicode characters. Underscore is always considered alphabetic. An identifier may also contain isolated apostrophes or hyphens provided the next character is alphabetic.
A name is anything that is a legal part of a variable name (not counting the sigil). This includes
$foo # simple identifiers
$Foo::Bar::baz # compound identifiers separated by ::
$Foo::($bar)::baz # compound identifiers that perform interpolations
$42 # numeric names
$! # certain punctuational variables
When not used as a sigil, the semantic function of :: within a
name is to force the preceding portion of the name to be considered
a package through which the subsequent portion of the name is to
be located. If the preceding portion is null, it means the package
is unspecified and must be searched for according to the nature of
what follows. Generally this means that an initial :: following the
main sigil is a no-op on names that are known at compile time, though
:: can also be used to introduce an interpolation (see below).
Also, in the absence of another sigil, :: can serve as its own
sigil indicating intentional use of a not-yet-declared package name.
Unlike in Perl 5, if a sigil is followed by comma, semicolon, colon, or any kind of bracket or whitespace (including Unicode brackets and whitespace), it will be taken to be a sigil without a name rather than a punctuational variable. This allows you to use sigils as coercion operators:
print $( foo() ) # foo called in item context
print @@( foo() ) # foo called in slice context
The bare sigil is parsed as a list operator in rvalue context, so these mean the same thing:
print $ foo() # foo called in item context
print @@ foo() # foo called in slice context
In declarative contexts bare sigils may be used as placeholders for anonymous variables:
my ($a, $, $c) = 1..3;
print unless (state $)++;
Outside of declarative contexts you may use * for a placeholder:
($a, *, $c) = 1..3;
Ordinary package-qualified names look like in Perl 5:
$Foo::Bar::baz # the $baz variable in package Foo::Bar
Sometimes it's clearer to keep the sigil with the variable name, so an alternate way to write this is:
Foo::Bar::<$baz>
This is resolved at compile time because the variable name is a constant.
The following pseudo-package names are reserved in the first position:
MY # Lexical variables declared in the current scope
OUR # Package variables declared in the current package
GLOBAL # Builtin variables and functions
PROCESS # process-related globals
OUTER # Lexical variables declared in the outer scope
CALLER # Contextual variables in the immediate caller's scope
CONTEXT # Contextual variables in any context's scope
SUPER # Package variables declared in inherited classes
COMPILING # Lexical variables in the scope being compiled
Other all-caps names are semi-reserved. We may add more of them in the future, so you can protect yourself from future collisions by using mixed case on your top-level packages. (We promise not to break any existing top-level CPAN package, of course. Except maybe ACME, and then only for coyotes.)
You may interpolate a string into a package or variable name using
::($expr) where you'd ordinarily put a package or variable name.
The string is allowed to contain additional instances of ::, which
will be interpreted as package nesting. You may only interpolate
entire names, since the construct starts with ::, and either ends
immediately or is continued with another :: outside the parens.
Most symbolic references are done with this notation:
$foo = "Bar";
$foobar = "Foo::Bar";
$::($foo) # package-scoped $Bar
$::("MY::$foo") # lexically-scoped $Bar
$::("*::$foo") # global $Bar
$::($foobar) # $Foo::Bar
$::($foobar)::baz # $Foo::Bar::baz
$::($foo)::Bar::baz # $Bar::Bar::baz
$::($foobar)baz # ILLEGAL at compile time (no operator baz)
Note that unlike in Perl 5, initial :: doesn't imply global.
Package names are searched for from inner lexical scopes to outer,
then from inner packages to outer. Variable names are searched
for from inner lexical scopes to outer, but unlike package names
are looked for in only the current package and the global package.
The global namespace is the last place it looks in either case.
You must use the * (or GLOBAL) package on the front of the
string argument to force the search to start in the global namespace.
Use the MY pseudopackage to limit the lookup to the current lexical
scope, and OUR to limit the scopes to the current package scope.
When "strict" is in effect (which is the default except for one-liners),
non-qualified variables (such as $x and @y) are only looked up from
lexical scopes, but never from package scopes.
To bind package variables into a lexical scope, simply say our ($x, @y).
To bind global variables into a lexical scope, predeclare them with use:
use GLOBAL <$IN $OUT>;
Or just refer to them as $*IN and $*OUT.
To do direct lookup in a package's symbol table without scanning, treat the package name as a hash:
Foo::Bar::{'&baz'} # same as &Foo::Bar::baz
GLOBAL::<$IN> # Same as $*IN
Foo::<::Bar><::Baz> # same as Foo::Bar::Baz
The :: before the subscript is required here, because the Foo::Bar{...}
syntax is reserved for defining an autovivifiable protoobject along with
its initialization closure (see S12).
Unlike ::() symbolic references, this does not parse the argument
for ::, nor does it initiate a namespace scan from that initial
point. In addition, for constant subscripts, it is guaranteed to
resolve the symbol at compile time.
The null pseudo-package is reserved to mean the same search list as an ordinary name search. That is, the following are all identical in meaning:
$foo
$::{'foo'}
::{'$foo'}
$::<foo>
::<$foo>
That is, each of them scans lexical scopes outward, and then the current package scope (though the package scope is then disallowed when "strict" is in effect).
As a result of these rules, you can write any arbitrary variable name as either of:
$::{'!@#$#@'}
::{'$!@#$#@'}
You can also use the ::<> form as long as there are no spaces in the name.
The current lexical symbol table is now accessible through the
pseudo-package MY. The current package symbol table is visible as
pseudo-package OUR. The OUTER name refers to the MY symbol table
immediately surrounding the current MY, and OUTER::OUTER is the one
surrounding that one.
our $foo = 41;
say $::foo; # prints 41, :: is no-op
{
my $foo = 42;
say MY::<$foo>; # prints "42"
say $MY::foo; # same thing
say $::foo; # same thing, :: is no-op here
say OUR::<$foo>; # prints "41"
say $OUR::foo; # same thing
say OUTER::<$foo>; # prints "41" (our $foo is also lexical)
say $OUTER::foo; # same thing
}
You may not use any lexically scoped symbol table, either by name or by reference, to add symbols to a lexical scope that is done compiling. (We reserve the right to relax this if it turns out to be useful though.)
The CALLER package refers to the lexical scope of the (dynamically
scoped) caller. The caller's lexical scope is allowed to hide any
variable except $_ from you. In fact, that's the default, and a
lexical variable must have the trait "is context" to be
visible via CALLER. ($_, $! and $/ are always
contextual.) If the variable is not visible in the caller, it returns
failure. Variables whose names are visible at the point of the call but that
come from outside that lexical scope are controlled by the scope
in which they were originally declared.
Hence the visibility of CALLER::<$+foo> is determined where
$+foo is actually declared, not by the caller's scope. Likewise
CALLER::CALLER::<$x> depends only on the declaration of $x
visible in your caller's caller.
Any lexical declared with the is context trait is by default
considered readonly outside the current lexical scope. You may
add a trait argument of <rw> to allow called routines to
modify your value. $_, $!, and $/ are context<rw>
by default. In any event, your lexical scope can always access the
variable as if it were an ordinary my; the restriction on writing
applies only to called subroutines.
The CONTEXT pseudo-package is just like CALLER except that
it starts in the current dynamic scope and from there
scans outward through all dynamic scopes until it finds a
contextual variable of that name in that context's lexical scope.
(Use of $+FOO is equivalent to CONTEXT::<$FOO> or $CONTEXT::FOO.)
If after scanning all the lexical scopes of each dynamic scope,
there is no variable of that name, it looks in the * package.
If there is no variable in the * package and the variable is
a scalar, it then looks in %*ENV for the identifier of the variable,
that is, in the environment variables passed to program. If the
value is not found there, it returns failure. Unlike CALLER,
CONTEXT will see a contextual variable that is declared in
the current scope, however it will not be writeable via CONTEXT unless
declared "is context<rw>", even if the variable itself is
modifiable in that scope. (If it is, you should just use the bare
variable itself to modify it.) Note that $+_ will always see
the $_ in the current scope, not the caller's scope. You may
use CALLER::<$+foo> to bypass a contextual definition of $foo
in your current context, such as to initialize it with the outer
contextual value:
my $foo is context = CALLER::<$+foo>;
The CONTEXT package is only for internal overriding of contextual
information, modelled on how environmental variables work among
processes. Despite the fact that the CONTEXT package reflects the
current process's environment variables, at least where those are not
hidden by lower-level declarations, the CONTEXT package should not
be considered isomorphic to the current set of environment variables.
Subprocesses are passed only the global %*ENV values. They do
not see any lexical variables or their values, unless you copy those
values into %*ENV to change what subprocesses see:
temp %*ENV{LANG} = $+LANG; # may be modified by parent
system "greet";
There is no longer any special package hash such as %Foo::. Just
subscript the package object itself as a hash object, the key of which
is the variable name, including any sigil. The package object can
be derived from a type name by use of the :: postfix operator:
MyType::<$foo>
MyType.::.{'$foo'} # same thing with dots
MyType\ ::\ {'$foo'} # same thing with unspaces
(Directly subscripting the type with either square brackets or curlies is reserved for various generic type-theoretic operations. In most other matters type names and package names are interchangeable.)
Typeglobs are gone. Use binding (:= or ::=) to do aliasing.
Individual variable objects are still accessible through the
hash representing each symbol table, but you have to include the
sigil in the variable name now: MyPackage::{'$foo'} or the
equivalent MyPackage::<$foo>.
* package: $*UID, %*ENV.
(The * may be omitted if you import the name from the GLOBAL
package.) $*foo is short for $*::foo, suggesting that the
variable is "wild carded" into every package.
For an ordinary Perl program running by itself, the GLOBAL and
PROCESS namespaces are considered synonymous. However, in certain
situations (such as shared hosting under a webserver), the actual
process may contain multiple virtual processes, each running its own
"main" code. In this case, the GLOBAL namespace holds variables
that properly belong to the individual virtual process, while the
PROCESS namespace holds variables that properly belong to the actual
process as a whole. From the viewpoint of the GLOBAL namespace
there is little difference, since process variables that normally
appear in GLOBAL are automatically imported from PROCESS.
However, the process as a whole may place restrictions on the
mutability of process variables as seen by the individual subprocesses.
Also, individual subprocesses may not create new process variables.
If the process wishes to grant subprocesses the ability to communicate
via the PROCESS namespace, it must supply a writeable variable
to all the subprocesses granted that privilege.
When these namespaces are so distinguished, the * shortcut always refers
to GLOBAL. There is no twigil shortcut for PROCESS.
$*IN, standard output is $*OUT, and standard error
is $*ERR. The magic command-line input handle is $*ARGS.
The arguments themselves come in @*ARGS. See also "Declaring a MAIN
subroutine" in S06.
= secondary
sigil. $=DATA is the name of your DATA filehandle, for instance.
All pod structures are available through %=POD (or some such).
As with *, the = may also be used as a package name: $=::DATA.
Magical lexically scoped values live in variables with a ? secondary
sigil. These are all values that are known to the compiler, and may
in fact be dynamically scoped within the compiler itself, and only
appear to be lexically scoped because dynamic scopes of the compiler
resolve to lexical scopes of the program. All $? variables are considered
constants, and may not be modified after being compiled in. The user
is also allowed to define or (redefine) such constants:
constant $?TABSTOP = 4; # assume heredoc tabs mean 4 spaces
(Note that the constant declarator always evaluates its initialization expression at compile time.)
$?FILE and $?LINE are your current file and line number, for
instance. ? is not a shortcut for a package name like * is.
Instead of $?OUTER::SUB you probably want to write OUTER::<$?SUB>.
Within code that is being run during the compile, such as BEGIN blocks, or
macro bodies, or constant initializers, the compiler variables must be referred
to as (for instance) COMPILING::<$?LINE> if the bare $?LINE would
be taken to be the value during the compilation of the currently running
code rather than the eventual code of the user's compilation unit. For
instance, within a macro body $?LINE is the line within the macro
body, but COMPILING::<$?LINE> is the line where the macro was invoked.
See below for more about the COMPILING pseudo package.
Here are some possibilities:
$?FILE Which file am I in?
$?LINE Which line am I at?
$?PARSER Which Perl grammar was used to parse this statement?
$?LANG Which Perl parser should embedded closures parse with?
&?ROUTINE Which routine am I in?
@?ROUTINE Which nested routines am I in?
&?BLOCK Which block am I in?
@?BLOCK Which nested blocks am I in?
$?LABEL Which innermost block label am I in?
@?LABEL Which nested block labels am I in?
All the nested @? variables are ordered from the innermost to the
outermost, so @?BLOCK[0] is always the same as &?BLOCK.
The following return objects that contain all pertinent info:
$?OS Which operating system am I compiled for?
$?DISTRO Which OS distribution am I compiling under
$?VM Which virtual machine am I compiling under
$?XVM Which virtual machine am I cross-compiling for
$?PERL Which Perl am I compiled for?
$?PACKAGE Which package am I in?
@?PACKAGE Which nested packages am I in?
$?MODULE Which module am I in?
@?MODULE Which nested modules am I in?
$?CLASS Which class am I in? (as variable)
@?CLASS Which nested classes am I in?
$?ROLE Which role am I in? (as variable)
@?ROLE Which nested roles am I in?
$?GRAMMAR Which grammar am I in?
@?GRAMMAR Which nested grammars am I in?
It is relatively easy to smartmatch these constant objects against pairs to check various attributes such as name, version, or authority:
given $?VM {
when :name<Parrot> :ver(v2) { ... }
when :name<CLOS> { ... }
when :name<SpiderMonkey> { ... }
when :name<JVM> :ver(v6.*) { ... }
}
Matches of constant pairs on constant objects may all be resolved at compile time, so dead code can be eliminated by the optimizer.
Note that some of these things have parallels in the * space at run time:
$*OS Which OS I'm running under
$*DISTRO Which OS distribution I'm running under
$*VM Which VM I'm running under
$*PERL Which Perl I'm running under
You should not assume that these will have the same value as their compile-time cousins.
While $? variables are constant to the run time, the compiler
has to have a way of changing these values at compile time without
getting confused about its own $? variables (which were frozen in
when the compile-time code was itself compiled). The compiler can
talk about these compiler-dynamic values using the COMPILING pseudopackage.
References to COMPILING variables are automatically hoisted into the
context currently being compiled. Setting or temporizing a COMPILING
variable sets or temporizes the incipient $? variable in the
surrounding lexical context that is being compiled. If nothing in
the context is being compiled, an exception is thrown.
$?FOO // say "undefined"; # probably says undefined
BEGIN { COMPILING::<$?FOO> = 42 }
say $?FOO; # prints 42
{
say $?FOO; # prints 42
BEGIN { temp COMPILING::<$?FOO> = 43 } # temporizes to *compiling* block
say $?FOO; # prints 43
BEGIN { COMPILING::<$?FOO> = 44 }
say $?FOO; # prints 44
BEGIN { say COMPILING::<$?FOO> } # prints 44, but $?FOO probably undefined
}
say $?FOO; # prints 42 (left scope of temp above)
$?FOO = 45; # always an error
COMPILING::<$?FOO> = 45; # an error unless we are compiling something
Note that CALLER::<$?FOO> might discover the same variable
as COMPILING::<$?FOO>, but only if the compiling context is the
immediate caller. Likewise OUTER::<$?FOO> might or might not
get you to the right place. In the abstract, COMPILING::<$?FOO>
goes outwards dynamically until it finds a compiling scope, and so is
guaranteed to find the "right" $?FOO. (In practice, the compiler
hopefully keeps track of its current compiling scope anyway, so no
scan is needed.)
Perceptive readers will note that this subsumes various "compiler hints" proposals. Crazy readers will wonder whether this means you could set an initial value for other lexicals in the compiling scope. The answer is yes. In fact, this mechanism is probably used by the exporter to bind names into the importer's namespace.
COMPILING::<$?PARSER>. Lexically scoped parser changes
should temporize the modification. Changes from here to
end-of-compilation unit can just assign or bind it. In general,
most parser changes involve deriving a new grammar and then pointing
COMPILING::<$?PARSER> at that new grammar. Alternately, the
tables driving the current parser can be modified without derivation,
but at least one level of anonymous derivation must intervene from
the standard Perl grammar, or you might be messing up someone else's
grammar. Basically, the current grammar has to belong only to the
current compiling scope. It may not be shared, at least not without
explicit consent of all parties. No magical syntax at a distance.
Consent of the governed, and all that.
It is often convenient to have names that contain arbitrary characters
or other data structures. Typically these uses involve situations
where a set of entities shares a common "short" name, but still needs
for each of its elements to be identifiable individually. For
example, you might use a module whose short name is ThatModule,
but the complete long name of a module includes its version, naming
authority, and perhaps even its source language. Similarly,
sets of operators work together in various syntactic categories
with names like prefix, infix, postfix, etc. The long
names of these operators, however, often contain characters that
are excluded from ordinary identifiers.
For all such uses, an identifier followed by a subscript-like adverbial form (see below) is considered an extended identifier:
infix:<+> # the official name of the operator in $a + $b
infix:<*> # the official name of the operator in $a * $b
infix:«<=» # the official name of the operator in $a <= $b
prefix:<+> # the official name of the operator in +$a
postfix:<--> # the official name of the operator in $a--
This name is to be thought of semantically, not syntactically. That is, the bracketing characters used do not count as part of the name; only the quoted data matters. These are all the same name:
infix:<+>
infix:<<+>>
infix:«+»
infix:['+']
Despite the appearance as a subscripting form, these names are resolved not at run time but at compile time. The pseudo-subscripts need not be simple scalars. These are extended with the same two-element list:
infix:<?? !!>
infix:['??','!!']
An identifier may be extended with multiple named identifier extensions, in which case the names matter but their order does not. These name the same module:
use ThatModule:ver<2.7.18.28.18>:auth<Somebody>
use ThatModule:auth<Somebody>:ver<2.7.18.28.18>
Adverbial syntax will be described more fully later.
Initial 0 no longer indicates octal numbers by itself. You must use
an explicit radix marker for that. Pre-defined radix prefixes include:
0b base 2, digits 0..1
0o base 8, digits 0..7
0d base 10, digits 0..9
0x base 16, digits 0..9,a..f (case insensitive)
The general radix form of a number involves prefixing with the radix in adverbial form:
:10<42> same as 0d42 or 42
:16<DEAD_BEEF> same as 0xDEADBEEF
:8<177777> same as 0o177777 (65535)
:2<1.1> same as 0b1.1 (0d1.5)
Extra digits are assumed to be represented by a..z and A..Z, so you
can go up to base 36. (Use A and B for base twelve, not T and E.)
Alternately you can use a list of digits in decimal:
:60[12,34,56] # 12 * 3600 + 34 * 60 + 56
:100[3,'.',14,16] # pi
Any radix may include a fractional part. A dot is never ambiguous because you have to tell it where the number ends:
:16<dead_beef.face> # fraction
:16<dead_beef>.face # method call
Only base 10 (in any form) allows an additional exponentiator starting with 'e' or 'E'. All other radixes must either rely on the constant folding properties of ordinary multiplication and exponentiation, or supply the equivalent two numbers as part of the string, which will be interpreted as they would outside the string, that is, as decimal numbers by default:
:16<dead_beef> * 16**8
:16<dead_beef*16**8>
It's true that only radixes that define e as a digit are ambiguous that
way, but with any radix it's not clear whether the exponentiator should
be 10 or the radix, and this makes it explicit:
0b1.1e10 ILLEGAL, could be read as any of:
:2<1.1> * 2 ** 10 1536
:2<1.1> * 10 ** 10 15,000,000,000
:2<1.1> * :2<10> ** :2<10> 6
So we write those as
:2<1.1*2**10> 1536
:2<1.1*10**10> 15,000,000,000
:2«1.1*:2<10>**:2<10>» 6
The generic string-to-number converter will recognize all of these
forms (including the * form, since constant folding is not available
to the run time). Also allowed in strings are leading plus or minus,
and maybe a trailing Units type for an implied scaling. Leading and
trailing whitespace is ignored. Note also that leading 0 by itself
never implies octal in Perl 6.
Any of the adverbial forms may be used as a function:
:2($x) # "bin2num"
:8($x) # "oct2num"
:10($x) # "dec2num"
:16($x) # "hex2num"
Think of these as setting the default radix, not forcing it. Like Perl
5's old oct() function, any of these will recognize a number starting
with a different radix marker and switch to the other radix. However,
note that the :16() converter function will interpret leading 0b
or 0d as hex digits, not radix switchers.
Characters indexed by hex numbers can be interpolated into strings
by introducing with "\x", followed by either a bare hex number
("\x263a") or a hex number in square brackets ("\x[263a]").
Similarly, "\o12" and "\o[12]" interpolate octals--but generally
you should be using hex in the world of Unicode. Multiple characters
may be specified within any of the bracketed forms by separating the
numbers with comma: "\x[41,42,43]". You must use the bracketed
form to disambiguate if the unbracketed form would "eat" too many
characters, because all of the unbracketed forms eat as many characters
as they think look like digits in the radix specified. None of these
notations work in normal Perl code. They work only in interpolations
and regexes and the like.
The old \123 form is now illegal, as is the \0123 form.
Only \0 remains, and then only if the next character is not in
the range '0'..'7'. Octal characters must use \o notation.
Note also that backreferences are no longer represented by \1
and the like--see S05.
The qw/foo bar/ quote operator now has a bracketed form: <foo bar>.
When used as a subscript it performs a slice equivalent to {'foo','bar'}.
Elsewhere it is equivalent to a parenthesisized list of strings:
('foo','bar'). Since parentheses are generally reserved just for
precedence grouping, they merely autointerpolate in list context. Therefore
@a = 1, < x y >, 2;
is equivalent to:
@a = 1, ('x', 'y'), 2;
which is the same as:
@a = 1, 'x', 'y', 2;
In item context, though, the implied parentheses are not removed, so
$a = < a b >;
is equivalent to:
$a = ('a', 'b');
which, because the list is assigned to a scalar, is autopromoted into an Array object:
$a = ['a', 'b'];
Likewise, if bound to a scalar parameter, <a b> will be
treated as a single list object, but if bound to a slurpy parameter,
it will auto-flatten.
But note that under the parenthesis-rewrite rule, a single value will still act like a scalar value. These are all the same:
$a = < a >;
$a = ('a');
$a = 'a';
And if bound to a scalar parameter, no list is constructed.
To force a single value to become a list object in item context,
you should use ['a'] for clarity as well as correctness.
Much like the relationship between single quotes and double quotes, single
angles do not interpolate while double angles do. The double angles may
be written either with French quotes, «$foo @bar[]», or
with "Texas" quotes, <<$foo @bar[]>>, as the ASCII workaround.
The implicit split is done after interpolation, but respects quotes
in a shell-like fashion, so that «'$foo' "@bar[]"» is guaranteed to
produce a list of two "words" equivalent to ('$foo', "@bar[]").
Pair notation is also recognized inside «...» and such "words" are
returned as Pair objects.
Colon pairs (but not arrow pairs) are recognized within double angles.
In addition, the double angles allow for comments beginning with #.
These comments work exactly like ordinary comments in Perl code.
That is, # at beginning of line is always a line-end comment,
otherwise a following bracket sequence implies an inline comment;
also, unlike in the shells, any literal # must be quoted, even
ones without whitespace in front of them, but note that this comes
more or less for free with a colon pair like :char<#x263a>.
There is now a generalized adverbial form of Pair notation. The following table shows the correspondence to the "fatarrow" notation:
Fat arrow Adverbial pair Paren form
========= ============== ==========
a => 1 :a
a => 0 :!a
a => 0 :a(0)
a => $x :a($x)
a => 'foo' :a<foo> :a(<foo>)
a => <foo bar> :a<foo bar> :a(<foo bar>)
a => «$foo @bar» :a«$foo @bar» :a(«$foo @bar»)
a => {...} :a{...} :a({...})
a => [...] :a[...] :a([...])
a => $a :$a
a => @a :@a
a => %a :%a
a => $$a :$$a
a => @$$a :@$$a (etc.)
a => %foo<a> %foo<a>:p
The fatarrow construct may be used only where a term is expected
because it's considered an expression in its own right, since the
fatarrow itself is parsed as a normal infix operator (even when
autoquoting an identifier on its left). Because the left side is a
general expression, the fatarrow form may be used to create a Pair
with any value as the key. On the other hand, when used as above
to generate Pair objects, the adverbial forms are restricted to
the use of identifiers as keys. You must use the fatarrow form to
generate a Pair where the key is not an identifier.
Despite that restriction, it's possible for other things to come between a colon and its brackets; however, all of the possible non-identifier adverbial keys are reserved for special syntactical forms. Perl 6 currently recognizes decimal numbers and the null key. In the following table the first and second columns do not mean the same thing:
Simple pair DIFFERS from which means
=========== ============ ===========
2 => <101010> :2<101010> radix literal 0b101010
8 => <123> :8<123> radix literal 0o123
16 => <deadbeef> :16<deadbeef> radix literal 0xdeadbeef
16 => $somevalue :16($somevalue) radix conversion function
'' => $x :($x) arglist or signature literal
'' => ($x,$y) :($x,$y) arglist or signature literal
'' => <x> :<x> identifier extension
'' => «x» :«x» identifier extension
'' => [$x,$y] :[$x,$y] identifier extension
'' => { .say } :{ .say } adverbial block
All of the adverbial forms (including the normal ones with identifier keys) are considered special tokens and are recognized in various positions in addition to term position. In particular, when used where an infix would be expected they modify the previous topmost operator that is tighter in precedence than "loose unary" (see S03):
1 .. 100 :by(3) # count to 100 by threes
Within declarations the adverbial form is used to rename parameter declarations:
sub foo ( :externalname($myname) ) {...}
Adverbs modify the meaning of various quoting forms:
q:x 'cat /etc/passwd'
When appended to an identifier (that is, in postfix position),
the adverbial syntax is used to generate unique variants of that
identifier; this syntax is used for naming operators such as infix:<+> and multiply-dispatched grammatical rules such as
statement_control:if. When so used, the adverb is considered an
integral part of the name, so infix:<+> and infix:<->
are two different operators. Likewise prefix:<+> is different
from infix:<+>. (The notation also has the benefit of grouping
distinct identifiers into easily accessible sets; this is how the
standard Perl 6 grammar knows the current set of infix operators,
for instance.)
Either fatarrow or adverbial pair notation may be used to pass named arguments as terms to a function or method. After a call with parenthesized arguments, only the adverbial syntax may be used to pass additional arguments. This is typically used to pass an extra block:
find($directory) :{ when not /^\./ }
This just naturally falls out from the preceding rules because the adverbial block is in operator position, so it modifies the "find operator". (Parens aren't considered an operator.)
Note that (as usual) the {...} form (either identifier-based
or special) can indicate either a closure or a hash depending on
the contents. It does not always indicate a subscript despite
being parsed as one. (The function to which it is passed can use
the value as a subscript if it chooses, however.)
Note also that the <a b> form is not a subscript and is
therefore equivalent not to .{'a','b'} but rather to ('a','b').
Bare <a> turns into ('a') rather than ('a',). (However,
as with the other bracketed forms, the value may end up being used
as a subscript depending on context.)
Two or more adverbs can always be strung together without intervening punctuation anywhere a single adverb is acceptable. When used as named arguments in an argument list, you may put comma between, because they're just ordinary named arguments to the function, and a fatarrow pair would work the same. However, this comma is allowed only when the first pair occurs where a term is expected. Where an infix operator is expected, the adverb is always taken as modifying the nearest preceding operator that is not hidden within parentheses, and if you string together multiple such pairs, you may not put commas between, since that would cause subsequent pairs to look like terms. (The fatarrow form is not allowed at all in operator position.) See S06 for the use of adverbs as named arguments.
The negated form (:!a) and the sigiled forms (:$a, :@a,
:%a) never take an argument and don't care what the next character
is. They are considered complete. These forms require an identifier
to serve as the key.
For identifiers that take a numeric argument, it is allowed to
abbreviate, for example, :sweet(16) to :16sweet. (This is
distinguishable from the :16<deadbeef> form, which never has an
alphabetic character following the number.) Only literal decimal
numbers may be swapped this way.
The other forms of adverb (including the bare :a form) always
look for an immediate bracketed argument, and will slurp it up.
If that's not intended, you must use whitespace between the adverb and
the opening bracket. The syntax of individual adverbs is the same
everywhere in Perl 6. There are no exceptions based on whether an
argument is wanted or not. (There is a minor exception for quote and
regex adverbs, which accept only parentheses as their bracketing
operator, and ignore other brackets, which must be placed in parens
if desired. See "Paren form" in the table above.)
Except as noted above, the parser always
looks for the brackets. Despite not indicating a true subscript,
the brackets are similarly parsed as postfix operators. As postfixes
the brackets may be separated from their initial :foo with either
unspace or dot (or both), but nothing else.
Regardless of syntax, adverbs used as named arguments (in either term or infix position) generally show up as optional named parameters to the function in question--even if the function is an operator or macro. The function in question neither knows nor cares how weird the original syntax was.
In addition to q and qq, there is now the base form Q which does
no interpolation unless explicitly modified to do so. So q is really
short for Q:q and qq is short for Q:qq. In fact, all quote-like
forms derive from Q with adverbs:
q// Q :q //
qq// Q :qq //
rx// Q :regex //
s/// Q :subst ///
tr/// Q :trans ///
Adverbs such as :regex change the language to be parsed by switching
to a different parser. This can completely change the interpretation
of any subsequent adverbs as well as the quoted material itself.
q:s// Q :q :scalar //
rx:s// Q :regex :sigspace //
Generalized quotes may now take adverbs:
Short Long Meaning
===== ==== =======
:x :exec Execute as command and return results
:w :words Split result on words (no quote protection)
:ww :quotewords Split result on words (with quote protection)
:q :single Interpolate \\, \q and \' (or whatever)
:qq :double Interpolate with :s, :a, :h, :f, :c, :b
:s :scalar Interpolate $ vars
:a :array Interpolate @ vars
:h :hash Interpolate % vars
:f :function Interpolate & calls
:c :closure Interpolate {...} expressions
:b :backslash Interpolate \n, \t, etc. (implies :q at least)
:to :heredoc Parse result as heredoc terminator
:regex Parse as regex
:subst Parse as substitution
:trans Parse as transliteration
:code Quasiquoting
You may omit the first colon by joining an initial Q, q, or qq with
a single short form adverb, which produces forms like:
qw /a b c/; # P5-esque qw// meaning q:w
Qc '...{$x}...'; # Q:c//, interpolate only closures
qqx/$cmd @args[]/ # equivalent to P5's qx//
(Note that qx// doesn't interpolate.)
If you want to abbreviate further, just define a macro:
macro qx { 'qq:x ' } # equivalent to P5's qx//
macro qTO { 'qq:x:w:to ' } # qq:x:w:to//
macro quote:<â° â±> ($text) { quasi { $text.quoteharder } }
All the uppercase adverbs are reserved for user-defined quotes. All Unicode delimiters above Latin-1 are reserved for user-defined quotes.
A consequence of the previous item is that we can now say:
%hash = qw:c/a b c d {@array} {%hash}/;
or
%hash = qq:w/a b c d {@array} {%hash}/;
to interpolate items into a qw. Conveniently, arrays and hashes
interpolate with only whitespace separators by default, so the subsequent
split on whitespace still works out. (But the built-in «...» quoter
automatically does interpolation equivalent to qq:ww/.../. The
built-in <...> is equivalent to q:w/.../.)
q :w /.../.
'', "", <>, «», ``, (),
[], and {} have no special significance when used in place of
// as delimiters. There may be whitespace before the
opening delimiter. (Which is mandatory for parens because q() is
a subroutine call and q:w(0) is an adverb with arguments). Other
brackets may also require whitespace when they would be understood as
an argument to an adverb in something like q:z<foo>//.
A colon may never be used as the delimiter since it will always be
taken to mean another adverb regardless of what's in front of it.
Nor may a # character be used as the delimiter since it is always
taken as whitespace (specifically, as a comment).
New quoting constructs may be declared as macros:
macro quote:<qX> (*%adverbs) {...}
Note: macro adverbs are automatically evaluated at macro call time if
the adverbs are included in the parse. If an adverb needs to affect
the parsing of the quoted text of the macro, then an explicit named
parameter may be passed on as a parameter to the is parsed subrule,
or used to select which subrule to invoke.
\qq[...] construct. Other "q" forms also work, including
user-defined ones, as long as they start with "q". Otherwise you'll
just have to embed your construct inside a \qq[...].
Bare scalar variables always interpolate in double-quotish strings. Bare array, hash, and subroutine variables may never be interpolated. However, any scalar, array, hash or subroutine variable may start an interpolation if it is followed by a sequence of one or more bracketed dereferencers: that is, any of:
In other words, this is legal:
"Val = $a.ord.fmt('%x')\n"
and is equivalent to
"Val = { $a.ord.fmt('%x') }\n"
In order to interpolate an entire array, it's necessary now to subscript with empty brackets:
print "The answers are @foo[]\n"
Note that this fixes the spurious "@" problem in double-quoted email addresses.
As with Perl 5 array interpolation, the elements are separated by a space. (Except that a space is not added if the element already ends in some kind of whitespace. In particular, a list of pairs will interpolate with a tab between the key and value, and a newline after the pair.)
In order to interpolate an entire hash, it's necessary to subscript with empty braces or angles:
print "The associations are:\n%bar{}"
print "The associations are:\n%bar<>"
Note that this avoids the spurious "%" problem in double-quoted printf formats.
By default, keys and values are separated by tab characters, and pairs are terminated by newlines. (This is almost never what you want, but if you want something polished, you can be more specific.)
In order to interpolate the result of a sub call, it's necessary to include both the sigil and parentheses:
print "The results are &baz().\n"
The function is called in item context. (If it returns a list anyway, that list is interpolated as if it were an array in string context.)
In order to interpolate the result of a method call without arguments, it's necessary to include parentheses or extend the call with something ending in brackets:
print "The attribute is $obj.attr().\n"
print "The attribute is $obj.attr<Jan>.\n"
The method is called in item context. (If it returns a list, that list is interpolated as if it were an array.)
It is allowed to have a cascade of argumentless methods as long as the last one ends with parens:
print "The attribute is %obj.keys.sort.reverse().\n"
(The cascade is basically counted as a single method call for the end-bracket rule.)
Multiple dereferencers may be stacked as long as each one ends in some kind of bracket:
print "The attribute is @baz[3](1,2,3){$xyz}<blurfl>.attr().\n"
Note that the final period above is not taken as part of the expression since it doesn't introduce a bracketed dereferencer.
A bare closure also interpolates in double-quotish context. It may
not be followed by any dereferencers, since you can always put them
inside the closure. The expression inside is evaluated in string item
context. You can force list context on the expression using
the list operator if necessary.
The following means the same as the previous example.
print "The attribute is { @baz[3](1,2,3){$xyz}<blurfl>.attr }.\n"
The final parens are unnecessary since we're providing "real" code in the curlies. If you need to have double quotes that don't interpolate curlies, you can explicitly remove the capability:
qq:c(0) "Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies";
or equivalently:
qq:!c "Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies";
Alternately, you can build up capabilities from single quote to tell it exactly what you do want to interpolate:
q:s 'Here are { $two uninterpolated } curlies';
$a interpolates, so do $^a, $*a,
$=a, $?a, $.a, etc. It only depends on the $.
A class method may not be directly interpolated. Use curlies:
print "The dog bark is {Dog.bark}.\n"
The old disambiguation syntax:
${foo[$bar]}
${foo}[$bar]
is dead. Use closure curlies instead:
{$foo[$bar]}
{$foo}[$bar]
(You may be detecting a trend here...)
"{.bark}".
"{abs $var}".
Backslash sequences still interpolate, but there's no longer any \v
to mean vertical tab, whatever that is... (\v now matches vertical
whitespace in a regex.) Literal character representations are:
\a BELL
\b BACKSPACE
\t TAB
\n LINE FEED
\f FORM FEED
\r CARRIAGE RETURN
\e ESCAPE
\L, \U, \l, \u, or \Q.
Use curlies with the appropriate function instead: "{ucfirst $word}".
You may interpolate any Unicode codepoint by name using \c and
square brackets:
"\c[NEGATED DOUBLE VERTICAL BAR DOUBLE RIGHT TURNSTILE]"
Multiple codepoints constituting a single character may be interpolated
with a single \c by separating the names with comma:
"\c[LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A, COMBINING RING ABOVE]"
Whether that is regarded as one character or two depends on the Unicode support level of the current lexical scope. It is also possible to interpolate multiple codepoints that do not resolve to a single character:
"\c[LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A, LATIN CAPITAL LETTER B]"
[Note: none of the official Unicode character names contains comma.]
You may also put one or more decimal numbers inside the square brackets:
"\c[13,10]" # CRLF
Any single decimal number may omit the brackets:
"\c8" # backspace
(Within a regex you may also use \C to match a character that is
not the specified character.)
If the character following \c or \C is neither a left square bracket
nor a decimal digit,
the single following character is turned into a control character by
the usual trick of XORing the 64 bit. This allows \c@ for NULL
and \c? for DELETE, but note that the ESCAPE character may not be
represented that way; it must be represented something like:
\e
\c[ESCAPE]
\c27
\x1B
\o33
Obviously \e is preferred when brevity is needed.
Any character that would start an interpolation in